Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 4-8
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
The use of vertical accents (unauthorised by Chopin) – instead of common, short horizontal accents in bars 4 and 8 – is a frequent phenomenon in first English editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 5-13
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In bars 5 and 13, in the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts |
|||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FE the last R.H. note is a crotchet, as a result of which the bar includes 7 quavers. In the main text we correct this mistake after the FC notation (→GE); this version is also in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
|
b. 31-63
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
In FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 39-47
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 2, Mazurka in B minor
..
There is no accidental to the last grace note in bars 39 and 47 in FC, while in FE in bars 39, 45 and 47. The patent oversights, the ones in bars 39 and 47 most probably by Chopin himself, who considered the earlier category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Foreign hand additions in manuscripts , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of FC |
to G in the bass and to g1 in the R.H. The latter was also added in both bars in 
raising e1 to e
1 in bars 31 and 63. The oversight, probably by Chopin in [A], was corrected in